Cultural Issues of Human Resource Management

Inter depicted object ledger of Evidence found learn and Mentoring Vol. 5. nary(prenominal) 2 August, 2007 rapscallion 45 Carrying heathenish Baggage the contribution of socio- ethnic anthropology to cross- ethnic train Barbara St Claire-Ostwald, CINCRA external passenger car & procreation Consultancy, UK Email Contact emailprotected com Abstract This chew over examines the pagan aw beness of professionals works in organisations.Given the multiethnical nature of immediatelys workforce, it is becoming increasingly important for companies and pushchaires alike to take into depend how cross- heathen deflections whitethorn run daily working practices. The read draws on a criticism of current research into heathen dimensions and looks at the mixed alliance surrounded by reputation and goal our cultural baggage. In order to search the touch sensations and cultural awareness of participants, a questionnaire was organizeed.The purpose of the questionnaire was to commit themes and orientations to cross-cultural issues in foothold non only of communality but excessively of paradoxes. The results highlighted a high take of recognition of cultural dilemmas and a comprehend need and willingness to address and reconcile them. until instantaneously, the diversity of opinions roughly the potential bene lasts of circumstantial methods of addressing cultural dilemmas suggested consider adequate uncertainly astir(predicate) traffic with cross cultural issues.Key Words Cross-cultural, cultural baggage, cultural dimensions, train, mentoring, socio-cultural anthropology Introduction The aim of this paper is to herald on the results of a study designed to explore the emerging fit of cross-cultural instruct (Rosinski 2003) and to establish the levels of awareness about, and attitudes to cross-cultural issues the patterns and/or traffichips between awareness, attitudes and cultural dimensions among bloodlinees and business organisatio n consultants, coaches, mentors and coaching/mentoring organisations.I began this study from the sight that man in that respect has been or so research into mentoring and coaching, there appeared to be little that counselsed specifically on cross-cultural influences. In my review of the for sale literature, it became increasingly ready that the integration of a cultural perspective into coaching was very overmuch at the pi integrityering stage. The main aims of this study were to try and establish levels of awareness bout, and attitudes to cross-cultural issues and to study the patterns and/or relationships between awareness, attitudes and the cultural dimensions developed by Hofstede and Trompenaars and HampdenTurner among businesses and business consultants, and coaching organisations. Cross-cultural coaching addresses the counsel in which cultural differences affect the daily lives of people, and raises awareness of cultural differences and the topic they tin acquire on the process of managing others and doing business in general.In todays global sparing organisations understand that to sustain roaring and resilient businesses and to keep their competitive edge, they must(prenominal) develop employees who understand their global business, and employ people with global skills. Rosinski (2003) and Trompenaars and Hampden-Turner (1997) open developed pioneering work in cross-cultural competencies and coaching methods. At a fundamental level, their International diary of Evidence Based learn and Mentoring Vol. 5. No. 2 August, 2007 Page 46 work has been establish on the kit and caboodle of socio-cultural anthropologists Hofstede (1980) and Schwartz (1994).Their contribution in overcoming cultural miscommunication, tension and conflict, including the perils of stereotyping and mono-culturalism, has helped to formulate and explore the surmisal of this study. Cultural baggage a by-product of cultural systems Socio-anthropological thinking is found on the premise that all humans are born with the akin introductory physical characteristics, but depending on where they grow up, each private is opened to disparate climates, foods, languages, religious beliefs and so onTherefore, are we really self-made or did our parents, teachers, families and friends have a hand in it? (Trompenaars and Hampden-Turner, 1997, p. 54). Thus, one could quit that the socioanthropological perspective on shade takes a holistic view, describing ending as a pattern of learned and shared behaviours of people and/or sorts consisting of belief systems and languages and of well-disposed relationships be they personal, organisational, or institutional. (Hall, 1963 Hall and Hall, 1987 Hofstede, 1980 Kondo, 1990 Levi-Strauss, 1966 Schwartz, 1994).Therefore, at a fundamental level, it could be argued that finis is a representation of a complete way of support of a people who share the same attitudes, values and practices. Csikszentmihalyi ( 1997, p. 7) makes the distinction of individuation by using snowflakes as a metaphor They look identical as they fall, but taking a closer look, we soon gather up that they are non identical. Hence, he argues, rather than seeing identicalness element as a single unitary self, perhaps cultural identity element should be viewed as being multi-faceted, i. e. cknowledging that people have a total of selves or identities depending on scene and condition. For example, the biggest barrier unmarrieds and/or employees encounter is not necessarily that they come from different parts of the world, or that they speak a different language or even occupy a different physical space, it is the baggage they carry in their aver cultural suitcases which require to be explored. Trompenaars and Hampden-Turner maintain that what people expect depends on where they come from, and the meanings they go along to what they have or are experiencing.They argue that expectations occur on more(pren ominal) different levels, from concrete, explicit level to implicit and sub intended ones (1997, p. 21). Furthermore, they describe culture as consisting of conglomerate layers The outer layers are the products and artefacts that symbolise the deeper, more basic values and assumptions about life. The different layers are not separate from one another, but are complementary . The shared meanings that are the core of the culture are man-made are in corporated into people within a culture yet transcend the people in culture. (1997, p. 7) Cross-cultural dilemmas Trompenaars and Hampden-Turner argue that Every culture distinguishes itself from others by the specific solutions it chooses to certain problems which reveal themselves as dilemmas (p. 8) to this end, they have incorporated best management theories into their own analysis of the problem of managing across cultures. These theories were realized by using a participant questionnaire profiler, which was based on their Seven Dime nsions of Culture model and by incorporating Trompenaars and Woolliams modeling for managing veer across cultures.Similarly, Rosinski breaker points out the dangers of our assumptions and beliefs systems when working with coachees from varying origins and backgrounds. He argues that by providing a framework for integrating coaching and cultural perspectives, i. e. examining numerous International Journal of Evidence Based instruct and Mentoring Vol. 5. No. 2 August, 2007 Page 47 cultural orientations, styles and approaches to coaching, the development of a cross-cultural mindset will be facilitated.For example, he writes Our identity could be viewed as this personal and combat-ready entailment of multiple cultures. Our behaviour will typically vary depending on the group we happen to be associated with . . The fact that our behaviours depend in part on the particular cultural context further in effect(p)ifies the need for coaches to integrate the cultural perspective into the ir practice. In some cases the obstacle to someones jump on may be cultural rather than psychological, thus calling for a different coaching dialogue. p. 1) Furthermore, he maintains that cultural awareness is more than just realizing another culture is different from our own it is too about encyclopedism to value that other culture. He argues that culture is behind our behaviour, and often without our realization. It croupe influence how close we stand, how loud we speak, how we deal with conflict and as a result, by failing to understand how culture impacts our needs and preferences, culture arse often lead us to misinterpret behaviour.Methodology As the research was exploratory, I focussed the design on twain main aspects the initial review of literature which drew on a broad array of coaching and socio-anthropological theories and studies, and the less extensive, but nevertheless in-depth cross-cultural coaching work of Trompenaars and Hampden-Turner (1997), and Rosinski (2003). In turn, this earmarkd the basis for the primary research, which took the form of a questionnaire which was sent to a blue expert subject area type to let out cross-cultural themes and patterns.To ensure that stick with participants had some recognizable expertise on the subject under investigation, I adopted the model in (Fig. 1) below. On the one hand, I was attempting to measure levels of awareness of cross-cultural issues, as well as to explore the concomitant opinions, beliefs and assumptions, and how they advert to the dimensions of culture. I was also trying to make sure that the survey respondents would have an interest in this particular area of study. Fig. Survey stress and Questionnaire Model Corporate/Business Consultants Awareness Opinions instruct Organisations The survey sample was not only limited in size, but also in terms of the geographical make-up of the participants, who were mostly from the U. K. with the rest from continental Europe. By Int ernational Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring Vol. 5. No. 2 August, 2007 Page 48 extension it would be difficult to generalise from the results, however, this was not the innovation of the study.While gender could also be a factor which might influence attitudes and resolutions, the exploratory nature of the study precluded it from being a controlled varying at this point, although this issue could form the basis for further research. The purpose of the initial questionnaire was to elicit the opinions of the survey participants in order to identify themes and orientations to cross-cultural issues, in terms of communality as well as potential paradoxes.It was also intend to see how these opinions and orientations fitted with responses to questions about the various cultural dimensions identified and developed by Hofstede and Trompenaars and Hampden-Turner. The questionnaire was therefore divided into two parts. The first section intercommunicate the opinions about attitudes, values and behaviours pertaining to culture in general, cultural dilemmas and, to crosscultural coaching and training specifically.I also decided to use a reckon of similar questions to check for inconsistencies in responses, which might indicate either a paradox in terms of opinions, possibly a conflict between a norm and a assumption individuals personal view, or could reflect a lack of appreciation for, or indeed indifference to, a given issue. The second section of the questionnaire was constructed on the basis of Hofstedes and Trompenaars and Hampden-Turners cultural dimensions, and sought to elicit culture-specific values, beliefs and assumptions which could influence cross-cultural interaction within a professional environment.Results, discussions and recommendations In analyzing the responses to the questionnaire, it was evident that there was a high level of recognition of the importance of cross-cultural issues, and the need to address and reconcile them. Ho wever it was very difficult to define or quantify levels of cultural awareness, which was to some extent unsurprising given the complexity of the issues involved. But as I outlined in the methodology, a major objective was also to explore the quality of awareness and ground of cultural dilemmas and dimensions.In this respect, the first section of the questionnaire (on attitudes to culture and potential cross-cultural training solutions) was very instructive in terms of perceptions about the relationship between culture and personality. In my opinion, the most remarkable contrast was that there was considerably great agreement that culture shapes the personality and a lot more uncertainty about how the individual shapes culture. This mental picture was further reinforced by the general agreement that managers from different cultures do not necessarily find it easy to adapt their behaviour to fit the different needs of another culture.From a coaching perspective, it suggests some anxiety needs to be paid to how an individual perceives and relates to his/her culture. For example, there is a swooning difference between seeing culture as providing a framework for affectionate interaction, which is constantly evolving, and on the other hand perceiving culture as providing a set of social constraints. In either case, there may be some elements of our culture, which at an individual level are considered to be important in our everyday lives, while there are others which may be difficult to accept, which could be sources of tension with other members of our culture.Given that such perceptions may be operating partly at a subconscious level, this may not be easy to establish. But they appear to me to be a significant element in the process of gaining a better intellectual of our cultural baggage, i. e. in how we synthesize the myriad of cultural groupings to which we are exposed on a daily basis. There was greater diversity of opinion about the benefits of speci fic cross-cultural training solutions, and when, where and how they might be applied.The initial conclusion that can be drawn is this shows that the process of integrating the cross-cultural domain into both business and coaching practice is still at an early stage of development. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring Vol. 5. No. 2 August, 2007 Page 49 As far as improving the general awareness and understanding of the benefits of cross-cultural training, three sets of responses in the first section seem to me to define some of the issues that need to be addressed.Firstly the fact that half of the respondents thinkd that cultural issues within organisations are dealt with only if they relate to behavioural issues is indicative of a certain level of resistance to dealing with these issues, which may be due to an appreciation of the complexity of such issues. On the other hand, if cultural issues in some organisations are only addressed when there is a behavio ural conflict, then this will tend to throw off them in a negative light.Hence it does lead to the conclusion that some organisations are not sufficiently aware that ignoring and playing spile cultural differences, as well as evaluating them negatively, is a major contributor to miscommunication, misunderstanding and conflict. Secondly, while coaches largely agreed that business managers recognise that diversity training should now include cross-cultural training for employees sent on global assignments, the business organisation responses were much divided.This leads me to conclude that some businesses are either unaware, or possibly not persuaded of the benefits of this specific approach. Nevertheless this set of responses, and the fact that no(prenominal) of the respondents disagreed that incorporating the dilemmas deriving from the differences in cultural dimensions help organisations to integrate their cultural orientations suggests that the make out area of uncertainty amo ng businesses and coaches is the method and/or models of integrating cultural dilemmas.The point that this suggests to me is, that before any attempt is made to develop the skills necessary to pull off the differences between cultures, a greater awareness of how we pull off difference in our own culture is required. This is to say we need to be more consciously and self-critically aware of the assumptions that underlie our habitual responses and modes of interaction, in other words our cultural baggage. In principal this is already the main focus of traditional coaching and mentoring.But I believe considerably more research needs to be conducted into how these methods and skills can be developed to take account of and integrate cross-cultural issues and dilemmas. From national to cross-cultural perspectives Cross-cultural research has largely focused on national differences because it is much easier to establish a persons nationality, than to identify him/her as belonging to anoth er type of cultural grouping, be that regional, professional, political, economical or social.The most frequently cited reason is that a given individual will be a member of numerous forms of socalled sub-cultures or high level cultures (e. g. European), which in effect rules them out as unique independent variables. But I believe that without exercising some control for the effect of these other cultural variables, it is difficult to be sure that attributing a given behaviour, belief, value or attitude expressed by an individual to national cultural influences is theoretically or empirically valid.For example, even at a national level, there has to be particular care to acknowledge the difference between ethnically diverse nations such as Canada or Malaysia ethnically and/or religiously divided nations such as Belgium or the former(prenominal) Yugoslavia, or relatively homogeneous nations such as Japan or Korea, let alone very complex national cultures such as China or India. In essence, this does nothing more than acknowledge that socio-cultural anthropology is the study of the dilemmas and problems of differences and similarities not only between, but also within societies.In the specific context of this study, one of the most interesting aspects of the responses to the second section of the questionnaire on cultural dimensions was the differences in opinions both within and between coaches and business organisations. My original intention in including a section on cultural dimensions was to explore the relationship between these responses and those on the first section of the questionnaire. But the differences of opinions between the two sets of respondents on universalism vs. particularism and individualism vs. ommunitarianism (Fig. 6) suggested to me that I had to consider whether these opinions in some way reflected values that were influenced by the differing needs and requirements of the corporate and coaching environments. I cannot conclude whethe r this was the key influence International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring Vol. 5. No. 2 August, 2007 Page 50 on these responses. However I do think this emphasizes that it is tenuous to assume that the responses to such value dimensions questionnaires can be ascribed largely to national culture.I also believe that the way that corporate and professional culture influences our habits and values requires a great deal more in-depth research. For example, it might be interesting to establish whether there are differences in the responses to a cultural dimensions questionnaire between professional groups, e. g. doctors, police officers, computer programmers, sports professionals, etc. , and how these compare to national differences. However, it also has to be acknowledged that the difficulty of plan any definite conclusions about key influences is clearly a bound to the use of questionnaires in general.This does suggest it would have been preferable to be able to expa nd and explore the data that was generated by the questionnaires via follow-up interviews. But, as discussed in the methodology, this would have required a lot more time and resources than were available to me in this study. Nevertheless analyzing the results in relation to the problem of ignoring and playing down the importance of cultural differences also suggested that the questionnaire design needed refinement.Specifically, I was unable to deduce or make any assumptions about what level of importance each respondent attached to each of the dimensions. A system of be the various value dimensions is not a new concept or methodology, in that it is very similar to the two basic bipolar dimensions of bareness to change vs. conservation and selfenhancement vs. self transcendence that are incorporated as higher dimensions in the Schwartz Value Inventory (Fig. 4).But more importantly I think that more research into develop a system of be the value dimensions would not only help to identify those value dimensions, which may be ignored, downplayed or even negatively evaluated, but also provide a potentially very useful tool for integrating the cross-cultural dimension into traditional coaching and mentoring practices. Conclusion From this specific perspective, a focus on quantifying how national cultures differ along the various value dimensions that have been identified does run some risk of contributing to the formation of cultural stereotypes, which have little or no predictive value.This is why greater emphasis needs to be placed on understanding our own cultural baggage from a coaching perspective, particularly on the dynamic processes of the way in which our own culture has, and is evolving. The building blocks of improving cultural awareness and developing cross-cultural skills therefore have much in common with the key skills associated with building rapport as a coach or mentor. For the coach or business organisation, it is therefore about understandin g the processes involved with the different shipway in which we negotiate social interaction, and the elements of the various models of culture.These range from the apparently simple distinction between the visible and invisible level of values (Fig. 1) to the complexity of Schwartzs Theoretical model of relations among motivational value types and two basic bipolar value dimensions (Fig. 4). It is about raising our awareness of what is subconscious and invisible up to a conscious and visible level and from there we can develop the skills necessary to negotiate ways of interacting with others whose values, attitudes and habits, or indeed in contexts are unfamiliar to us.I believe that if this is to be achieved, coaching and cross-cultural research needs to transcend the limitations of a focus on national culture. It needs to acknowledge that cultural identity should be viewed as being multi-faceted, and that people have a number of selves or identities depending on context and sett ing. The work of Schwartz, Hofstede and Trompenaars & Hampden-Turner has provided very valuable keenness into the cultural dimensions, which help to identify the way in which values differ between national cultures.However, they would also be the first to acknowledge that International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring Vol. 5. No. 2 August, 2007 Page 51 national cultures are in a constant press out of change, and this in turn dictates the need to evolve their questionnaires, re-analyze the accompanying databases of results, and amend and delimitate their models accordingly. But perhaps the key aspect for further research is to develop methods that place a greater emphasis on the processes though which culture changes.In other words how human actions and practices change, and new meanings evolve in response to changes to social contexts. By this I mean for example the impact of increase migration (whether voluntary, or in response to political or economic factors), or the proliferation of new forms of communication like the internet, not only on working environments, but on the myriad ways in which we organize our social lives. The point being that this should help to move research and practice from a focus on more abstract concepts such as values, to the ways in which culture is produced and negotiated.Consequently, as Rosinski (2003, p. xviii) said, intercultural professionals will be better equipped to fulfil their commitment to extend peoples worldviews, bridge cultural gaps, and enable successful work across cultures. References Clutterbuck, D. (1985), Everyone needs a Mentor, facts of life talent at work (3rd Ed), Trowbridge The Cromwell Press Clutterbuck, D. (2003), The Problem with research in mentoring The Coaching and Mentoring Network Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997), Living Well, The Psychology of Everyday support, London Weidenfeld and Nicolson Flaherty, J. 1999), Coaching Evoking Excellence in Others, Burlington MA Elsevier Foucau lt, M. (1980) Power/Knowledge Selected Interviews and Other publications 1972-1977, Ed. Colin Gordon, New York Pantheon Books Gray, J. (2000), Two Faces of Liberalism, London Polity Press Hall, E. T. (1963), The Silent Language, Greenwich computed axial tomography Fawcett Publications Inc. Hall, E. T. (1976), beyond Culture, Garden City NY Anchor Press Hall, E. T. (1984), The Dance of Life The Other Dimension of Time, Garden City NY Anchor Press/Doubleday Hall, E. T. & Hall, M. R. 1987), hide Differences Doing business with the Japanese, Garden City NU Anchor Press/Doubleday Hall, E. T. & Hall, M. R. (1990), Understanding Cultural Differences, Yarmouth, ME Intercultural Press Hofstede, G. H. (1980), Cultures Consequences International Differences in piss-Related Values, Beverly Hills Sage Publications Hofstede, G. H. (1991), Cultures and Organizations software product of the Mind, London McGraw-Hill U. K. , (1997) New York, McGraw-Hill U. S. A. , Third Millennium Edition, an d (2004) New York McGraw-Hill U. S. A. Hofstede, G.H. (1998), Masculinity and muliebrity The Taboo Dimension of National Cultures, Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publications Hofstede, G. H. & McCrae, R. R. (2004), genius and Culture Revisited Linking Traits and Dimensions of Culture, Cross-Cultural query, Vol. 38, No. 1, p. 52-88 Hussey, J. & Hussey, R. (1997), Business Research A practical guide for undergraduate and postgraduate students, London Macmillan Press Ltd. Jarvis, J. (2004), Coaching and Buying Coaching Services a CIPD guide, London CIPD Enterprises Ltd Kerlinger, F. N. 1979,) Behavioural Research A Conceptual Approach, New York Holt, Rinehart and Winston Kondo, D. (1990), Crafting Selves Power, Gender and Discourses of Identity in a Japanese Workplace, Chicago University of Chicago Press, pp. 9, 11-24 International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring Vol. 5. No. 2 August, 2007 Page 52 Kram, K. E. (1988), Mentoring at Work Developmental Relationships in Organ izational Life, Lanham University Press of America Kuhn, T. S. (1962), The Structure of scientific Revolutions, Chicago University of Chicago Press Levi-Strauss, C. 1966), The Savage Mind, London Weidenfeld and Nicolson Megginson, D. & Clutterbuck, D. (1995), Mentoring in exertion a practical guide for managers, London Kogan Page Ltd. Nietzsche, F. quotes, QuotationsPage (2005) http//www. quotationspage. com/quotes/Friedrich_Nietzsche/ Oxford lexicon of position (2003), Catherine Soanes and Angus Stevenson (Editors), Oxford Oxford University Press Peterson, D. & Hicks, M. D. (1996), Leader as coach Strategies for coaching and developing others, Minneapolis, MN Personnel Decisions International Potter, J. Wetherell, M. (1995), Discourse analysis, in Smith, J. , Harre, R. , van Langenhove, R. , (Eds), Rethinking Methods in Psychology, London Sage Robson C. (1992), Real World Research A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitionerresearchers, Oxford Blackwell Publishing Rosinsk i, P. (2003), Coaching Across Cultures, London Nicholas Brealey Schwartz, S. H. (1994), Beyond Individualism/Collectivism New Dimensions of Values. in Individualism and Collectivism surmise Application and Methods, U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C.Kagitciabasi, S. C. Choi and G. Yoon (Eds) Newbury Park CA Sage. Tao Te Ching quotes, ThinkExist quotations (2005), http//en. thinkexist. com/quotes/Tao_Te_Ching The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (2000), quaternary Ed. Boston Houghton Mifflin The Encyclopaedic Dictionary of Sociology (1991), 4th edition, Guilford, Connecticut The Dushkin Publishing Group, Inc. Trompenaars, F. & Hampden-Turner, C. (1997), Riding the Waves of Culture, London Nicholas Brealey (2nd Ed) Trompenaars, F. & Hampden-Turner, C. 1993), The Seven Cultures of Capitalism, London Piatkus Trompenaars, F. & Woolliams, P. (2003), Journal of Change commission Vol. 3, 4, p. 361375 Henry Stewart Publication Watson, T. J. (2001), In Search of Management Cult ure, chaos and control in managerial work, London Thomson Learning Whitworth, L. , Kimsey-House, H. , Sandahl, P. (1998), Co-Active Coaching, Palo Alto, CA Davies-Black Publishing Zachary, L. J. (2000), The Mentors Guide Facilitating Effective Learning Relationships, San Francisco Jossey-Bass Zeus, P. & Skiffington, S. 2002), The Coaching at Work Toolkit A Complete Guide to Techniques and Practices, Australia McGraw-Hill Barbara StClaire-Ostwald is an international coach and freelance consultant who specialises in cross-cultural awareness and developing successful and effective communication skills for global managers and teams. Barbara grew up in the United country as a Polish/British dual national. Prior to setting up her coaching practice CINCRA, she lived and worked in the UK, Continental Europe and magnetic north Africa for over 30 years working for multinationals in the private, public and not for profit sectors.Barbara is a member of the European Mentoring and Coaching Co uncil (EMCC) and until recently, Chair of the EMCC European Conference Committee. She is also a member of the British Psychological Society, charter Institute of Personnel Development, British Sociological Association and the Society for Intercultural Education, Training and Research (SIETAR). She is tri-lingual (Polish, English, French) and she is able to converse in Dutch, German, Czech and Slovak.